The Environment Agency has issued an objection against plans to alter Ipswich Waterfront as it says the proposals pose "a danger".
Associated British Ports (ABP) submitted plans in July to remove 93 existing pontoons and replace them with 15 new ones at Neptune Marina.
Additionally, ABP will also add a foul water treatment plant and two welfare buildings on either side of the marina - with toilets and showers for the users.
However, the Environment Agency has now submitted its objections to these plans as it believes there will be increased chances of flood and pollutants released.
An ABP spokesperson said that it has a team currently engaging with the Environment Agency to address the concerns.
“ABP takes its role as a responsible developer with the utmost seriousness," the spokesperson added.
"We are committed to ensuring that our projects meet the highest environmental standards and contribute positively to the communities in which we operate."
After conducting a flood risk assessment, the agency said that, taking climate change into account, the chances of a flood are one in 200.
However, in case of a flood, the toilet and shower block and the sewage treatment plant could be adversely affected.
In a statement to Ipswich Borough Council, the Environment Agency stated: "We agree that this indicates that there will be a danger for all people (e.g. there will be danger of loss of life for the general public and the emergency services)."
Additionally, the agency also believes that there is a risk that the construction will release pollutants as it lies in a contaminated area.
Therefore, the Environment Agency has placed an objection to ABP's proposal.
It asks that the applicants provide risk assessment plans and proposed flood resistance measures before the plans are approved.
An ABP spokesperson added: “Regarding the recent holding objection from the Environment Agency concerning our marina plans, we fully acknowledge and respect their concerns.
"Our team is actively engaging with the Environment Agency to address the issues raised, particularly those related to potential pollutants and flood risk.”
If plans are approved, work would begin in early 2025.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel