A decision on plans to build 25 homes in a village near Ipswich has been deferred, leading one councillor to say in jest "can we not just keep on voting until we get the right result?"
East Suffolk Council's planning committee came together on Tuesday to discuss plans for the new homes in Tuddenham St Martin.
The plans have been met with strong objections from residents and the parish council, which has said the proposals are not "feasible" and do not follow local and national guidelines due to there being "no footpath access anywhere".
The councillors, of which there were nine, came together to discuss the plans and take a final vote on whether to approve the plans, which is what was originally recommended.
The vote, however, lead to five votes against the plans, and four in favour, which lead to the chair of the committee stating: "So that has failed."
Richard Ward, a resident, said of the meeting: "This is when the shenanigans began.
"Up until this point, I thought it was a fair process and they did a good job of discussing the facts.
"I was flabbergasted by what happened next.
"Those that voted against went on to explain their reasoning, and that, in my view, should have been the end of it.
"But the discussion continued, and councillor Debbie McCallum proposed to defer a decision that had already been made as far as I'm concerned."
The reason the application was deferred was so that the council could seek third-party advice on highways safety.
Following the deferral, councillor Colin Hedgley said: "Mr Chairman, can we not just keep voting until we get the right result?"
"We voted, that's it."
This was met with a response from the chair, who said: "You've got to refuse on a certain basis and people are not quite happy with what you said."
Mr Ward added: "Any straight-thinking person can see that this development does not meet requirements in terms of access.
"Getting in an independent consultant to review the safety of the connection to the village is a waste of council money."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel